Sisters Doing It for Themselves ...

Caz Snell and Becki Sykes launch themselves at feminism

By Caz Snell

So what is feminism? Are we (the humble writers) classing ourselves as feminists? Yes I guess we are, but not the men hating, bra-burning types who would regard the above quotation as the corner stone of their philosophy.

Being the rabid evangelical types and not particularly the quieter for our sex, we decided to look and see just what the Bible (as God’s word to each of us) says on the subject of what women can and can’t do. Preach it Caz …

What does the Bible say? But Bex, as the dear reader who was so absorbed in my testimony will realize, I have only been a Christian for 18 months and thus feel unqualified to answer such a controversial point. Secondly, as an enthusiastic Politics student I have just recently dropped the course that I was studying on feminism, and no longer attend Women’s Group (alas, I digress). However, I can certainly tell you what the Bible doesn’t say about the subject, from my reading of it.

So you tell me what the Bible says, Bex …

Well, Caz, I reckon that the first few points are fairly fluffy, easy to understand and to accept.

This last couple might seem a smidge harsh but in practice, submission means something very different to the connotations which we give it nowadays. Submission is a loving and voluntary co-operation which you give because you love God and respect the roles He has given you and because you love your husband. It's not about treating your wife like an unpaid slave — sorry lads.

If and when I get married (form an orderly queue guys) I wouldn’ t have any trouble listening to and co-operating with a man who I knew loved me and the Lord and who could command my respect by his life and character. This all seems quite easy. I thought feminism and Christianity were incompatible. Ah … women in the church. That’s the tricky bit. What does the Bible say about it Caz?

Muchos thanking you Bex for the joy of writing this bit. Women in the Church, well, at a glance it appears that women should not even raise their voice in church. Is there more to it than this I ask? Indeed there is (why else would we bother to write an article otherwise?). The main passage that is generally quoted on the subject is 1 Timothy 2. This implies at first reading that women should not teach or have authority or speak in church. However, if you go back to the Greek in which it was first written, it says that rather than being silent, as a woman, one should be composed and quiet. But what of the teaching? In the times of early Jewish culture, women were not even allowed to study; could this be why they were not allowed to teach? We understand the dangers of arguing from a cultural perspective, but we think it is important to understand some of the reasoning behind Paul’s teachings. The danger in those times would be that women so carried away by their new freedom in the Church wouldn’t stop to consider whether their teaching was right or wrong, but would just enjoy the thrill of standing up in front of a large crowd. I wonder what dangers Paul would teach against in the Church today?

If we skim off all the nasty cultural references the Biblical writers were addressing we can see that the principles God wants us to abide by are neither feminist nor misogynist. They’re peoplist. God wants us to live in harmony with each other in mutual and loving respect — putting Him and others before ourselves.

Caz Snell and Becki Sykes